Adjiage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2007). An
experiment in teaching ratio and proportion. *Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 65*, 149-175.

Alpers, B. (2009). Studies on the mathematical
expertise of mechanical engineers. In R. A. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines
& A. Hurfard (Eds.), *Modeling students' mathematical modeling
competencies: Proceedings of ICTMA 13*. New York: Springer.

American Association for the Advancement of
Science. (1993). *Benchmarks for science literacy*. New York: Oxford
University Press.

Aristotle. (350 B.C.E.). *Physics* (R. P.
Hardie & R. K. Gaye, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Internet Classics Archive.
Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.mb.txt.

Aubrecht, G. J. (2012). Changes coming to the
International System of Units. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 338. doi:
10.1119/1.4745684

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M.
(2011). About the International System of Units (SI) Part I. Introduction and
Bibliography. *The Physics Teacher, 49*, 493. doi: 10.1119/1.3651731

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M.
(2011). About the International System of Units (SI) Part II. Organization and
General Principles. *The Physics Teacher, 49*, 540. doi: 10.1119/1.3661096

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M.
(2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part III. SI Table. *The
Physics Teacher, 50*, 10. doi: 10.1119/1.3670073

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2012).
About the International System of Units (SI) Part IV. Writing, Spelling, and
Mathematics. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 77. doi: 10.1119/1.3677278

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M.
(2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part V. Units Not to be
Used with SI. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 159. doi: 10.1119/1.3685113

Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M.
(2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part VI. SI in the USA. *The
Physics Teacher, 50*, 204. doi: 10.1119/1.3694066

Bakker, A., Groenveld, D., Wijers, M., Akkerman,
S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2012). Proportional reasoning in the laboratory: an
intervention study in vocational education. *Educational Studies in
Mathematics*, 1-11. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y/fulltext.html
doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y

Barrett, J. E., & Clements, D. H. (2003).
Quantitying path length: Fourth-grade children's developing abstractions for
linear measurement. *Cognition and Instruction, 21*, 475-520.

Bass, H. (2015). *Is the number line something
to be built, or occupied?* Paper presented at the conference Mathematics
Matters in Education: A workshop in honor of Dr. Roger Howe, Texas A & M
University.

Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2007).
Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In
J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early
grades* (pp. 165-184). New York: Erlbaum.

Beckman, S. (2004). Solving algebra and other
story problems with simple diagrams: A method demonstrated in grade 4-6 texts
used in Singapore. *Mathematics Educator, 14*, 42-46.

Bednarz, N., Radford, L., Janvier, B., &
Lepage, A. (1992). Arithmetical and algebraic thinking in problem solving. In
W. Geeslin & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Annual Meeting
of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America *(Vol 1. Durham,
NH: PME.

Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A.
(1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis -- Emphasis on the
operator construct. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), *Rational
numbers: An integration of research* (pp. 49–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A.
(1994). Units of quantity: A conceptual basis common to additive and
multiplicative structures. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The
development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp.
123–176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student
interpretation of kinematics graphs. *American Journal of Physics, 62*,
750-762. doi: 10.1119/1.17449

Bender, P. (1990). Zwei "zügande" zum
integral-begriff? [Two "approaches" to the integral-concept?]. *mathematica
didactica, 13*, 102-126.

Blanton, M. L. (2008). *Algebra and the
elementary classroom: Transforming thinking, transforming practice*.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2007).
Building district capacity for teacher development in algebraic reasoning. In
J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early
grades* (pp. 361-388). New York: Erlbaum.

Bodanskii, F. G. (1991). The formation of an
algebraic method of problem solving in primary school. In V. V. Davydov (Ed.), *Psychological
abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics*, Soviet
Studies in Mathematics Education (Vol 6). Reston, VA: National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics.

Boester, T., & Lehrer, R. (2007). What is
algebra? What is algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M.
L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 211-235). New York:
Erlbaum.

Bridgman, P. W. (1922). *Dimensional analysis*.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bridgman, P. W. (1936). *The nature of physical
theory*. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bridgman, P. W. (1959). *The way things are*.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2007).
Multiple notational systems and algebraic understandings: The case of the
"Best Deal" problem. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L.
Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 273-302). New York:
Erlbaum.

Brown, G. B. (1976). Newton, language and mass. *Physics
Education, 11*, 373-377.

Byerley, C., Hatfield, N., & Thompson, P. W.
(2012). Calculus students' understandings of division and rate. *Proceedings
of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics
Education*, pp. 358-363). Portland, OR: MAA/SIGMAA on RUME. Retrieved from
http://bit.ly/Ztgu4h.

Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2014).
Secondary teachers' relative size schemes. In P. Liljedahl & C. C. Nicol
(Eds.), *Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education *(Vol 2, pp. 217-224). Vancouver, BC:
PME. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1qyqmaK.

Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017).
Secondary teachers' meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. *Journal
of Mathematical Behavior, 48*, 168-193.

Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2010). Eighth
grade students' representations of linear equations based on a cups and tiles
model. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74*, 143-162.

Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students
think differently in mathematical problem solving? Impact of early algebra
learning and teachers' beliefs. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23*,
135-167.

Callahan, J., Hoffman, K., Cox, D., O'Shea, D.,
Pollatsek, H., & Senechal, L. (2008). *Calculus in context: The Five
College Calculus Project*. Amherst, MA: Five Colleges, Inc. Retrieved from
Smith College at http://www.math.smith.edu/Local/cicintro/book.pdf.

Callender, C. (2010, June). Is time an illusion? *Scientific
American,* 59-65.

Carlson, M. P., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. A.
(2003). Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research
and practice. In R. A. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), *Beyond constructivism in
mathematics teaching and learning: A models and modeling perspective* (pp.
465-478). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., &
Brizuela, B. M. (2000). Early algebra, early arithmetic: Treating operations as
functions. In M. Fernandez (Ed.), *Proceedings of the Twenty-second annual
meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics
Education-North America *(Vol 1, pp. 1-26). Tucson, AZ: PME-NA.

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., &
Schwartz, J. L. (2007). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J.
J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early
grades* (pp. 235-272). New York: Erlbaum.

Castillo-Garsow, C. (2013). The role of multiple
modeling perspectives in students' learning of exponential growth. *Mathematical
Biosciences and Engineering, 10*, 1437-1453. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1437

Castillo-Garsow, C. C. (2012). Continuous
quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S.
Belbase (Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding*,
WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 55-73). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Chapman, R. H. (1975). The development of
children's understanding of proportions. *Child Development, 46*, 141-148.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep12189755

Chi, M. T. H., Feltovish, P. J., & Glaser, R.
(1981). Catagorization and represenation of physics problems by experts and
novices. *Cognitive Science, 5*, 121-152.

Clagett, M. (1968). *Nicole Oresme and the
medieval geometry of qualities and motions*. Madison, WI: University of
Wisconsin Press.

Cooke, R., & Hilgevoord, J. (1980). The
algebra of physical magnitudes. *Foundations of Physics, 10*, 363-373.

Cortina, J., Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P.
W. (1999). Multiplicative conceptions of arithmetic mean. In F. Hitt (Ed.), *Proceedings
of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education*. Cuernavaca, Mexico: Centro de
Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados.

Darrigol, O. (2003). Number and measure: Hermann
von Helmholtz at the crossroads of mathematics, physics, and psychology. *Studies
in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34*, 515-573. doi:
10.1016/s0039-3681(03)00043-8

Davydov, V. V. (1975). The psychological
characteristics of the “prenumerical” period of mathematics instruction (A.
Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), *Soviet studies in the psychology of
learning and teaching mathematics* (Vol 7, pp. 109–206). Palo Alto, CA and
Reston, VA: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Davydov, V. V. (1975). Logical and psychological
problems of elementary mathematics as an academic discipline (A. Bigelow,
Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), *Soviet studies in the psychology of learning
and teaching mathematics* (Vol 7, pp. 55-108). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA:
School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Dogbey, J. (2015). Using variables in school
mathematics: Do school mathematics curricula provide support for teachers? *International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14*, 1175-1196. doi:
10.1007/s10763-015-9643-4

Dougherty, B. (2007). Measure up: A quantitative
view of early algebra. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton
(Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 389-412). New York: Erlbaum.

Doughty, L., McLoughlin, E., & van Kampen, P.
(2014). What integration cues, and what cues integration in intermediate
electromagnetism. *American Journal of Physics, 82*, 1093-1103. doi:
10.1119/1.4892613

Dubinsky, E. (1994). Comments on James Kaput's
chapter: New routes to old routes. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), *Mathematical
thinking and problem solving* (pp. 157-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

El'konin, D. B., & Davydov, V. V. (1975).
Learning capacity and age level: Introduction (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P.
Steffe (Ed.), *Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching
mathematics* (Vol 7, pp. 1-12). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School
Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Elandt-Johnson, R. C. (1975). Definiton of rates:
Some remarks on their use and misuse. *American Journal of Epidemiology, 102*,
267-271.

Ellis, A. B. (2007). The influence of reasoning
with emergent quantitites on students' generalizations. *Cognition &
Instruction, 25*, 439-478.

Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting
actions: How classroom collaborations can support students mathematical generalizations.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42*, 308-345.

Ellis, A. B., Özgür, Z., Kulow, T., Williams, C.
C., & Amidon, J. (2012). Quantifying exponential growth: The case of the
Jactus. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), *Quantitative
reasoning: Current state of understanding*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp.
93-112). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Ely, R. (2017). Definite integral registers using
infinitesimals. *The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48*, 152-167. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.002

Empson, S. B., Junk, D., Dominguez, H., &
Turner, E. (2006). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related
quantities: A cross-sectional study of children's thinking. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 63*, 1-28.

Engrand, J. C. (1981). *Units and their
equivalences*. Paris: Vuibert.

Ferrari-Escolá, M., Martínez-Sierra, G., &
Méndez-Guevara, M. E. M. (2016). “Multiply by adding”: Development of
logarithmic-exponential covariational reasoning in high school students. *The
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42*, 92-108. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.03.003

Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Solares, A. (2010).
Problems dealing with unknown quantities and two different levels of
representing unknowns. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41*,
52-80.

Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., &
Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in
multiplication and division. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,
16*, 3–17.

Fonger, N. L., Ellis, A., & Dogan, M. F.
(2016). Students’conceptions supporting their symbolization and meaning of
function rules. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil & J. A. Eli (Eds.), *Proceedings
of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the INternational
Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*, pp. 156-163). Tucson,
AZ: PME-NA.

Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Battey, D.
(2007). Content matters: Algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher
& M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 333-360).
New York: Erlbaum.

Freudenthal, H. (1974). Soviet research on
teaching algebra at the lower grades of the elementary school. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 5*, 391-412.

Freudenthal, H. (1982). Variables and functions.
In G. v. Barneveld & H. Krabbendam (Eds.), *Proceedings of the Conference
on Functions*, pp. 7-20). Enschede, The Netherlands: National Institute for
Curriculum Development.

Freudenthal, H. (1993). Thoughts on teaching
mechanics: Didactical phenomenology of the concept of force. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 25*, 71-87. doi: 10.2307/3482878

Fritzsch, H. (1994). *An equation that changed
the world: Newton, Einstein and the theory of relativity* (K. Heusch,
Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Galilei, G. (1914). *Dialogue conerning two new
sciences* (H. Crew & A. d. Salvio, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Retrieved from http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/tns_draft/.

Glasser, H. M. (2012). The numbers speak: Physics
first supports math performance. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 53. doi:
10.1119/1.3670088

Goldberg, H., & Wagreich, P. (1990). Teaching
integrated math and science: A curriculum and staff development project for the
elementary school. In N. Fisher, H. Keynes & P. Wagreich (Eds.), *Mathematicians
and education reform: Proceedings of the July 6-8, 1988 workshop* (pp.
63–130). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Goldenberg, E. P., & Shteingold, N. (2007).
Early algebra: The math workshop perspective. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher
& M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 449-478).
New York: Erlbaum.

Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999).
Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an
example. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39*, 111-129. doi:
10.1023/a:1003749919816

Greer, B. (1988). Non-conservation of
multiplication and division: Analysis of a symptom. *Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 7*, 281–298.

Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as
models of situations. In D. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook of resarch on learning
and teaching mathematics* (pp. 276–295). New York: Macmillan.

Greer, B. (1993). The mathematical modeling
perspective on wor(l)d problems. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12*,
223–250.

Greer, B. (1994). Extending the meaning of
multiplication and division. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The
development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp.
61–87). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Hack, W. N., & Baird, W. H. (2012). Using a
high-speed camera to measure the speed of sound. *The Physics Teacher, 50*,
45. doi: 10.1119/1.3670086

Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning
with reversible multiplicative relationships. *Cognition and Instruction, 28*,
383-432. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2010.511565

Hackenberg, A. J., Jones, R., Eker, A., &
Creager, M. (2017). “Approximate” multiplicative relationships between
quantitative unknowns. *The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48*, 38-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.002

Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw,
C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. *Cognition
and Instruction, 6*, 223–283.

Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The
initial knowledge state of college physics students. *American Journal of
Physics, 53*, 1043-1056.

Hammer, D. (in press). Epistemological
considerations in teaching introductory physics. *Science Education*.

Hanna, G., Bruyn, Y. d., Sidoli, N., & Lomas,
D. (2004). Teaching proof in the context of physics. *ZDM Mathematics
Education, 36*, 82-90.

Harel, G., Behr, M., Lesh, R. A., & Post, T.
(1994). Invariance of ratio: The case of children's anticipatory scheme for
constancy of taste. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*,
324–345.

Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A.
(1992). The blocks task and qualitative reasoning skills of 7th Grade children.
*Cognition and Instruction, 9*, 45–96.

Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A.
(1994). The impact of number type on the solution of multiplication and
division problems: Further considerations. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.),
*The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics*
(pp. 365–386). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Hart, K. (1978). The understanding of ratios in
secondary school. *Mathematics in School, 7*, 4–6.

Hawkings, S. W. (1988). *A brief history of
time*. New York: Bantam.

Hedrick, E. R. (1921). *The function concept in
secondary school mathematics: A report to the National Committee on
Mathematical Requirements*. (Secondary School Circular, No. 8). Washington,
DC: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education. Retrieved from
http://bit.ly/1kqIEtS.

Hegarty, M., Just, M., & Morrison, I. (1988).
Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and
quantitative reasoning. *Cognitive Psychology, 20*, 191–236.

Heller, P. M., Post, T. R., Behr, M., & Lesh,
R. A. (1990). Qualitative and numerical reasoning about fractions and rates by
seventh- and eighth-grade students. *Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 21*, 388–402.

Helmholtz, H. V. (1878/1977). The facts in
perception. In *Epistemological Writings* (pp. 115-185): Springer.

Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995).
Interpreting the force concept inventory. *The Physics Teacher, 33*,
502-506.

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G.
(1992). Force concept inventory. *The Physics Teacher, 30*, 141-158.

Hiebert, J. (1981). Cognitive development and
learning linear measurement. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,
12*, 197-211.

Hirstein, J. J., Lamb, C. E., & Osborne, A.
(1978). Student misconcpetions about area. *Arithmetic Teacher, 25*,
10–16.

Hohensee, C. (2014). Backward transfer: An
investigation of the influence of quadratic functions instruction on students’
prior ways of reasoning about linear functions. *Mathematical Thinking and
Learning, 16*, 135-174. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2014.889503

Hunt, J. (2007). Communicating big themes in
applied mathematics. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), *Mathematical
modelling: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Teaching
of Mathematical Modelling and Applications* (pp. 2-24). Chichester, UK:
Horwood Publishing.

Huntley, H. E. (1967). *Dimensional analysis*.
New York: Dover.

Ipsen, D. C. (1923). *Units, dimensions, and
dimensionless numbers*. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Izsak, A. (2004). Students' coordination of
knowledge when learning to model physical situations. *Cognition and
Instruction, 22*, 81-128. doi: 10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_4

Izsák, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for
teaching fraction multiplication. *Cognition & Instruction, 26*,
95-143. doi: 10.1080/07370000701798529

Izsák, A., Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2009).
Meta-representation in an Algebra I classroom. *Journal of the Learning
Sciences, 18*, 549-587.

Izsák, A., & Findell, B. R. (2005). Adaptive
interpretation: Building continuity between students' experiences solving
problems in arithmetic and in algebra. *ZDM Mathematics Education, 37*,
60-67.

Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in
mathematics education. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12*, 113–122.

Jiang, C., & Chua, B. L. (2010). Strategies
for solving three fraction-related word problems on speed: A comparative study
between Chinese and Singaporean students. *International Journal of Science
and Mathematics Education, 8*, 73-96.

Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about variation
in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. *Journal
of Mathematical Behavior, 31*, 313-330.

Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about quantities
involved in rate of change as varying simultaneously and independently. In R.
Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), *Quantitative
reasoning: Current state of understanding*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp.
39-53). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Johnson, H. L. (2015). Together yet separate: Students’
associating amounts of change in quantities involved in rate of change. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 89*, 89-110. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9590-y

Johnson, H. L. (in press). Secondary students’
quantification of ratio and rate: A framework for reasoning about change in
covarying quantities. *Mathematical Thinking and Learning*.

Johnston, P. R. (2013). How long is my toilet
roll? – a simple exercise in mathematical modelling. *International Journal
of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44*, 938-950. doi:
10.1080/0020739x.2013.790502

Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on
student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. *The
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45*, 95-110. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.002

Joram, E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Gelman, R.
(1998). Measurement estimation: Learning to map the route from number to
quantity and back. *Review of Educational Research, 68*, 413-449.

Joshua, S., Musgrave, S., Hatfield, N., &
Thompson, P. W. (2015). Conceptualizing and reasoning with frames of reference.
In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, K. Keene & M. Zandieh (Eds.), *Proceedings
of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in
Undergraduate Mathematics Education*, pp. 31-44). Pittsburgh, PA: RUME.

Kamii, C., & Russell, K. A. (2010). The older
of two trees: Young children's development of operational time. *Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 41*, 6-13.

Kamii, C., & Russell, K. A. (2012). Elapsed
time: Why is it so difficult to teach? *Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 43*, 296-315.

Kaput, J. J. (1985).* The cognitive foundations
of models that use intensive quantities*. Southeastern Massachussetts
University, Department of Mathematics.

Kaput, J. J. (1986).* Quantity structure of
algebra word problems: A preliminary analysis*. Southeastern Massachussetts
University, Department of Mathematics.

Kaput, J. J. (1994). Democratizing access to
calculus: New routes to old roots. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), *Mathematical
thinking and problem solving* (pp. 77–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J. (2007). What is algebra? What is
algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.),
*Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 5-18). New York: Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J., Blanton, M. L., & Moreno, L.
(2007). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W.
Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp.
19-56). New York: Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M.
L. (Eds.). (2007). *Algebra in the early grades*. New York: Erlbaum.

Kaput, J. J., & Pattison-Gordon, L. (1987).*
A concrete-to-abstract software ramp: Environments for learning
multiplication, division, and intensive quantity*. Southeastern
Massachussetts University, Department of Mathematics.

Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing
value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning
patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The development of
multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp. 237–287).
Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Karplus, R. (1979). Continuous functions:
Students’ viewpoints. *European Journal of Science Education, 1*, 397-415.
doi: 10.1080/0140528790010404

Keene, K. A. (2007). A characterization of
dynamic reasoning: Reasoning with time as parameter. *The Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 26*, 230-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.09.003

Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of
school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook for research on mathematics
teaching and learning* (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.

Klein, A. H. (1974). *The world of
measurements: The definitive book on the units and concepts by which we measure
everything in our universe*. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function
concept: A brief survey. *College Mathematics Journal, 20*, 282–300.

Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The
real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative
reasoning. *The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13*, 129-164.

Lamon, S. J. (1994). Ratio and proportion:
Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In G. Harel & J. Confrey
(Eds.), *The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of
mathematics* (pp. 89–120). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Lawson, A., & Bealer, J. (1984). The
acquisition of basic quantitative reasoning skills during adolescence:
Learning or development? *Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21*,
417–423.

Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2013).
Relationships between fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning: The case of
willa. *International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12*,
975-1000. doi: DOI 10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8

Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of
entropy and thermodynamics — Part II. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 87. doi:
10.1119/1.3677281

Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of
entropy and thermodynamics — Part III. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 170.
doi: 10.1119/1.3685118

Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of
entropy and thermodynamics — Part IV. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 215. doi:
10.1119/1.3694071

Left, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of
entropy and thermodynamics — Part I. *The Physics Teacher, 50*, 28. doi:
10.1119/1.3670080

Lehrer, R. (2013). A learning progression emerges
in a trading zone of professional community and identity. In R. Mayes & L.
L. Hatfield (Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science
education: Papers from an international STEM research symposium*, WISDOMe
Monographs (Vol 3, pp. 173-186). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Leinwand, S., & Ginsburg, A. (2009). *Measuring
up: How the highest performing state (Massachussetts) compares to the highest
performing country (Hong Kong) in grade 3 mathematics*. Washington, DC:
American Institutes for Research.

Lesh, R. A., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E.
(1983). Conceptual models and applied mathematical problem-solving research. In
R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), *Acquisition of mathematics concepts and
processes* (pp. 263–343). New York: Academic Press.

Lesh, R. A., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988).
Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), *Number concepts
and operations in the middle grades* (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Lins, R., & Kaput, J. (2004). The early
development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. In *The
Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12 th ICMI Study* (pp.
45-70): Springer.

Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2002). Randomness:
Rethinking the foundations of probability. In D. Mewborn (Ed.), *Proceedings
of the Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the International
Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*. Athens, GA: PME-NA.

Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2004). Teachers'
personal and pedagogical understandings of probability and statistical
inference. In D. McDougall (Ed.), *Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual
Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*.
Toronto: PME-NA.

Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2005). Teachers'
understandings of hypothesis testing. In S. Wilson (Ed.), *Proceedings of the
Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of
Mathematics Education - North America*. Roanoke, VA: PME-NA.

Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Teachers'
understandings of probability. *Cognition and Instruction, 25*, 113-160.

Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2009).
Mathematics teachers' understandings of proto-hypothesis testing. *Pedagogies:
An International Journal, 4*, 126-138. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/16JZQTx.

Livy, S., & Herbert, S. (2013). Second-year
pre-service teachers' responses to proportional reasoning test items. *Australian
Journal of Teacher Education, 38*, 17-32. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol38/iss11/2.

Lo, J.-J., & Watanabe, T. (1997). Developing
ratio and proportion schemes: A story of a fifth grader. *Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 28*, 216-236.

Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B.
(2013). Students' mathematical noticing. *Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 44*, 809-850.

Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., &
Diamond, J. (2012). Using student reasoning to inform the development of
conceptual learning goals: The case of quadratic functions. *Mathematical
Thinking and Learning, 14*, 85-119.

Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002).
Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. *Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 21*, 87-116.

Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2002).
Developing understanding of ratio-as-measure as a foundation for slope. In B.
Litwiller (Ed.), *Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: 2002
Yearbook of the NCTM*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Lochhead, J., & Mestre, J. (1988). From words
to algebra: Mending misconceptions. In A. Coxford (Ed.), *The ideas of
algebra: K-12* (pp. 127–135). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Lopshits, A. M. (1963). *Computation of areas
of oriented figures* (J. Massalski & C. Mills, Trans.), Survey of recent
East European mathematical literature, A. I. Putnam & I. Wirszup, ed.
Boston: D. C. Heath.

Madison, B. L., Carlson, M. P., Oehrtman, M.,
& Tallman, M. (2015). Conceptual precalculus: Strengthening students'
quantitative and covariational reasoning. *The Mathematics Teacher, 109*,
54-59.

Mark-Zigdon, N., & Tirosh, D. (2007). What is
a legitamate arithmetic number sentence? The case of kindergarten and
first-grade children. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton
(Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 201-210). New York: Erlbaum.

Mashood, K. K. (2010). Historico-Critical
Analysis of the Concept of Mass: From Antiquity to Newton. *Episteme, 3*,
33-37.

Mason, J. (2007). Making use of children's powers
to produce algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L.
Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 57-94). New York:
Erlbaum.

Mason, J., Graham, A., Pimm, D., & Gowar, N.
(1985). *Routes to roots of algebra*. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University
Press.

Massironi, C. (2014). Philip Fisher’s sense of
numbers. *Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 6*, 302-331. doi:
10.1108/qrfm-01-2013-0004

Massironi, C., & Chesini, G. (2016). Kenneth
Fisher's heuristics: An account of Kenneth Fisher's framework to reason the
innovation of investing tools and invest by knowing what others don't. *Qualitative
Research in Financial Markets, 8*, 130-148. doi: 10.l108/QRFM-07-2015-0026

Matthews, P. G., & Ellis, A. B. (in press).
Natural alternatives to natural number: The case of ratio. *Journal of
Numerical Cognition*.

Mayes, R. L., Forrester, J. H., Christus, J. S.,
Peterson, F. I., Bonilla, R., & Yestness, N. (2013). Quantitative reasoning
in environmental science: A learning progression. *International Journal of Science
Education*, 1-24.

McDermott, L., Rosenquist, M., & vanZee, E.
(1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from
kinematics. *American Journal of Physics, 55*, 503–513.

Mellone, M., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren,
W. (2017). The effect of rewording and dyadic interaction on realistic
reasoning in solving word problems. *The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46*,
1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.02.002

Michell, J. (1993). The origins of the
representational theory of measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell. *Studies
In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24*, 185-206.

Miller, A. I. (1984). *Imagery in scientific
thought*. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.

Minskaya, G. I. (1975). Developing the concept of
number by means of the relationship of quantities (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L.
P. Steffe (Ed.), *Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching
mathematics* (Vol 7, pp. 207–261). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School
Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the ’’at rest’’
condition of an object. *The Physics Teacher, 20*, 10. doi:
10.1119/1.2340924

Monk, G. S. (1992). *A study of calculus
students’ constructions of functional situations: The case of the shadow
problem*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Conference Paper

Monk, G. S. (1992). Students’ understanding of a
function given by a physical model. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), *The
concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy* (pp. 175–194).
Washington, D. C.: Mathematical Association of America.

Monk, S., & Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case
of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual
attributes. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), *Research
in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 1*, Issues in Mathematics Education
(Vol 4, pp. 139–168). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Moore, K. C. (2010). *The role of quantitative
reasoning in precalculus students learning central concepts of trigonometry.*
Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, quantitative
reasoning, and the trigonometry of students. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L.
Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning: Current state of
understanding*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 75-92). Laramie, WY:
University of Wyoming.

Moore, K. C. (2012). Making sense by measuring
arcs: A teaching experiment in angle measure. *Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 83*, 225-245. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9450-6

Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and
the sine function: The case of Zac. *Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 45*, 102-138.

Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012).
Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. *The
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31*, 48-59. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.001

Moore, K. C., Carlson, M. P., & Oehrtman, M.
(2009). The role of quantitative reasoning in solving applied precalculus
problems. *Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Special Interest Group of the
Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics
Education (SIGMAA on RUME) Conference, Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State
University*.

Moore, K. C., & Thompson, P. W. (under review). Static and emergent shape thinking.

Moyer, J. C., Sowder, L., Threadgill-Sowder, J.,
& Moyer, M. B. (1984). Story problem formats: Drawn versus verbal versus
telegraphic. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15*, 342-351.

Mullen, K. (2007). *Students' conceptions of
time as a variable.* BS Honors Mathematics B. Sc. Honors Thesis, Arizona
State University, Tempe, AZ.

Musgrave, S., Hatfield, N., & Thompson, P. W.
(2015). Calculus students' meaning for difference. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E.
Infante, K. Keene & M. Zandieh (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 18th Meeting
of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics
Education*, pp. 809-814). Pittsburgh, PA: RUME.

Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E.
(1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for
the design of learning environments. *Cognition and Instruction, 9*,
329-389.

Nemirovsky, R. (1994). On ways of symbolizing:
The case of Laura and the velocity sign. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior,
13*, 389-422.

Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of
difficulties in verbal arithmetic problems. *Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 7*, ??–??

Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues
as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. *Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 6*, ??–??

Newton, I., Sir. (1952). *Mathematical
principles of natural philosophy* (A. Motte & F. Cajori, Trans.), The
Great Books. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.

Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the
mathematics classroom: An unknown quantity? In D. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook for
research on mathematics teaching and learning* (pp. 101–114). New York:
Macmillan.

Noelting, G. (1980). The development of
proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part I - differentiation of
stages. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11*, 217–253.

Noelting, G. (1980). The development of
proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part 2 - Problem structure at
successive stages: Problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive
restructuring. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11*, 331–363.

Nunes, T. (2012). Number, quantities and
relations: Understanding mathematical reasoning in primary school. *Proceedings
of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education*. Seoul, Korea:
PME.

Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2015). The
development of quantitative reasoning. In L. S. Liben & U. Müller (Eds.), *Handbook
of child development and developmental science* (Vol 2 - Cognitive
processes, pp. 715-762). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., & Barros,
R. (2015). Assessing quantitative reasoning in young children. *Mathematical
Thinking and Learning, 17*, 178-196. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2015.1016815

Nunes, T., Desli, D., & Bell, D. (2003). The
development of children's understanding of intensive quantities. *International
Journal of Educational Research, 39*, 651-675. doi:
10.1016/j.ijer.2004.10.002

Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D.
W. (1993). *Street mathematics and school mathematics*. London: Cambridge
University Press.

Núñez, R. (2006). Do *real* numbers really
move? Language, thought and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of
mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), *18 unconventional essays on the nature of
mathematics* (pp. 160-181). New York: Springer.

Olive, J., & Çağlayan, G. (2008). Learners’
difficulties with quantitative units in algebraic word problems and the
teacher’s interpretation of those difficulties. *International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 6*, 269-292.

Paoletti, T., & Moore, K. C. (2017). The
parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning. *The Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 48*, 137-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003

Park, J. (2015). Is the derivative a function? If
so, how do we teach it? *Educational Studies in Mathematics*. doi:
10.1007/s10649-015-9601-7

Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent:
A privileged proportion. *Review of Research in Education, 65*, 421-481.

Paulos, J. A. (1988). *Innumeracy: Mathematical
illiteracy and its consequences*. New York: Hill and Wang.

Paulos, J. A. (1995). *A mathematician reads
the newspaper*. New York: Basic Books.

Peled, I., & Carraher, D. W. (2007). Signed
numbers and algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L.
Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 303-328). New York:
Erlbaum.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). *The
child's construction of quantities: Conservation and atomism*. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Pimthong, P., Yutakom, N., Angka, V. R.,
Sanguanruang, S., Cowie, B., & Cooper, B. (2012). Teaching and learning
about matter in grade 6 classrooms: A conceptual change approach. *International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10*, 121-137.

Pollak, H. O. (1969). How can we teach
applications of mathematics? *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2*,
393-404. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482089.

Powers, W. (1973). Feedback: Beyond behaviorism.
*Science, 179*, 351–356.

Reed, S. K. (2006). Does unit analysis help
students construct equations? *Cognition and Instruction, 24*, 341-366.

Resnick, L. B., & Singer, J. A. (1993).
Protoquantitative origins of ratio reasoning. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema
& T. A. Romberg (Eds.), *Rational numbers: An integration of research*
(pp. 107–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988).
Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of
solving problems. *Cognition and Instruction, 5*, 49–101.

Roberts, D. A., & Östman, L. (1998). *Problems
of meaning in science curriculum*, Ways of knowing in science series. New York:
Teachers College Press.

Robinson, E. (1977). On the uniqueness of
problems in mathematics. *Arithmetic Teacher, 25*, 23–26.

Saenz-Ludlow, A. (1994). Michael's fraction
schemes. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 50–85.

Saenz-Ludlow, A. (1995). Ann’s fraction schemes. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 28*, 101–132.

Saldanha, L. A. (2016). Conceptual issues in
quantifying unusualness and conceiving stochastic experiments: Insights from
students’ experiences in designing sampling simulations. *Statistics
Education Research Journal, 15*, 81-105.

Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (1998).
Re-thinking co-variation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous
continuous variation. In S. B. Berenson & W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), *Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North
America *(Vol 1, pp. 298-304). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State
University. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1b4sjQE.

Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2002).
Students' scheme-based conceptions of sampling and its relationship to
statistical inference. In D. Mewborn (Ed.), *Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth
annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics
Education - North America *(Vol 3, pp. 1305-1312). Athens, GA: PME-NA.

Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2003).
Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 51*, 257-270.

Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2007).
Exploring connections between sampling distributions and statistical inference:
An analysis of students' engagement and thinking in the context of instruction
involving repeated sampling. *International Electronic Journal of Mathematics
Education, 2*, 270-297.

Sawyer, W. W. (1964). *Vision in elementary mathematics*
(Vol. 1), Introducing mathematics. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.

Schifter, D., Monk, S., Russell, S. J., &
Bastable, V. (2007). Early algebra: What does understanding the laws of
arithmetic mean in the elementary grades. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher &
M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 413-448). New
York: Erlbaum.

Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., &
Brizuela, B. M. (2006). *Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic*.
New York: Routledge.

Schmidt, S., & Weiser, W. (1995). Semantic
structures of one-step word problems involving multiplication or division. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 28*, 55–72.

Schmittau, J. (1993). Historical and concerptual
analysis as foundations for curriculum: Multiplicative structrure as a case. *Proceedings
of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies
in Science and Mathematics*. Ithaca, NY: Misconceptions Trust. Retrieved
from http://mlrg.org/proc3pdfs/Schmittau_Mathematics.pdf.

Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of
algebraic thinking: A Vygotskian perspective. *ZDM Mathematics Education, 37*,
16-22.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Early algebra as
mathematical sense making. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton
(Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 479-510). New York: Erlbaum.

Schwartz, J. (1988). Intensive quantity and
referent transforming arithmetic operations. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr
(Eds.), *Number concepts and operations in the middle grades* (pp. 41–52).
Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Selter, C., Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De
Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. *Educational Studies in Mathematics,
42*, 211-213.

Sengupta, P., Krinks, K. D., & Clark, D. B.
(2015). Learning to deflect: Conceptual change in physics during digital game
play. *Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24*, 638-674. doi:
10.1080/10508406.2015.1082912

Siegler, R. S., Strauss, S., & Levin, I.
(1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. *Monographs of
the Society for Research in Child Development, 46*, 1-84. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1165995.

Simon, M. A. (1996). Beyond inductive and
deductive reasoning: The search for a sense of knowing. *Educational Studies
in Mathematics, 30*, 197-210.

Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Building
and understanding multiplicative relationships: A study of preservice teachers.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 472–494.

Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994).
Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-as-measure: A study
of prospective elementary teachers. *Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13*,
183-197. doi: 10.1016/0732-3123(94)90022-1

Simon, M. A., & Placa, N. (2012). Reasoning
about intensive quantities in whole-number multiplication? A possible basis for
ratio understanding. *For the Learning of Mathematics, 32*, 35-41.

Smith, E. (2007). Representational thinking as a
framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J.
Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early
grades* (pp. 133-160). New York: Erlbaum.

Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (1998).*
Multiplicative quantitative reasoning and algebra*. Employing children's
natural powers to build algebraic reasoning in the context of elementary
mathematics.

Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2007).
Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J.
Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early
grades* (pp. 95-132). New York: Erlbaum.

Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J.
(1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in
transition. *The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3*, 115–163.

Smith, J. P., Males, L. M., Dietiker, L. C., Lee,
K., & Mosier, A. (2013). Curricular treatments of length measurement in the
United States: Do they address known learning challenges? *Cognition and
Instruction, 31*, 388-433. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2013.828728

Sowder, J. T., Armstrong, B. E., Lamon, S. J.,
Simon, M. A., Sowder, L. K., & Thompson, A. G. (1998). Educating teachers
to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades. *Journal of Mathematics
Teacher Education, 1*, 127-155.

Stalvey, H. E., & Vidakovic, D. (2015).
Students’ reasoning about relationships between variables in a real-world
problem. *The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40*, 192-210. doi:
10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.002

Steen, L. A. (2001). The case for quantitative
literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), *Mathematics and democracy: The case for
quantitative literacy* (pp. 1-22). Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National
Fellowship Foundation.

Steffe, L. P. (1991). Operations that generate
quantity. *Journal of Learning and Individual Differences, 3*, 61–82.

Steffe, L. P. (1991). *Composite units and
their schemes*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Conference Paper

Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying and
dividing schemes: An overview. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The
development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp.
3–39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Steffe, L. P. (2003). Fractional commensurate,
composition, and adding schemes: Learning trjectories of Jason and Laura. *Journal
of Mathematical Behavior, 22*, 237-295.

Steffe, L. P. (2013). On children's construction
of quantification. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), *Quantitative
reasoning in mathematics and science education: Papers from an international
STEM research symposium*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 3, pp. 13-41). Laramie,
WY: University of Wyoming.

Steiner, H.-G. (1969). Magnitudes and rational
numbers: A didactical analysis. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2*,
371-392. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482088. doi:
10.2307/3482088

Streefland, L. (1993). Fractions: A realistic
approach. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), *Rational
numbers: An integration of research* (pp. 289–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000).
Grade 6 students' preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent
problem situations. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*,
89-112.

Sylla, E. (1971). Medieval quantifications of
qualities: The "merton school". *Archive for History of Exact
Sciences, 8*, 9-39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41133336.
doi: 10.2307/41133336

Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W.,
& Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching
mathematics. In A. Coxford (Ed.), *1994 Yearbook of the NCTM* (pp. 79–92).
Reston, VA: NCTM.

Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1993). *A
cognitive perspective on the mathematical preparation of teachers*. Paper
presented at the Algebra Initiative Colloquium, Washingon, DC.

Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996).
Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*, 2-24.

Thompson, P. W. (1987, 1991). Word Problem Analyst (Version 2.1) [Cognitive modeling program]. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.

Thompson, P. W. (1988). *Preparing
middle-school students for algebra*. Paper presented at the NCTM Research
Presession, Chicago, IL. Conference Paper

Thompson, P. W. (1988). Quantitative concepts as
a foundation for algebra. In M. Behr (Ed.), *Proceedings of the Annual
Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education *(Vol 1, pp. 163–170). Dekalb, IL.
Retrieved from http://bit.ly/11hLII7.

Thompson, P. W. (1990).* A theoretical model of
quantity-based reasoning in arithmetic and algebra*. San Diego State
University, Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Education.

Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning,
complexity, and additive structures. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25*,
165–208.

Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the
concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J.
Confrey (Eds.), *The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning
of mathematics* (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and
operational understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 26*, 229–274.

Thompson, P. W. (1994). *Bridges between
mathematics and science education*. Paper presented at the Research
blueprint for science education conference, New Orleans, LA. Conference Paper

Thompson, P. W. (1995). Notation, convention, and
quantity in elementary mathematics. In J. Sowder & B. Schapelle (Eds.), *Providing
a foundation for teaching middle school mathematics* (pp. 199–221). Albany,
NY: SUNY Press.

Thompson, P. W. (1996). Imagery and the
development of mathematical reasoning. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.
A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), *Theories of mathematical learning* (pp.
267-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thompson, P. W. (2000). What is required to
understand fractal dimension? *The Mathematics Educator, 10*, 33-35.

Thompson, P. W. (2008). *One approach to a
coherent K-12 mathematics: Or, it takes 12 years to learn calculus*. Paper
presented at the Pathways to Algebra Conference, Mayenne, France. Retrieved
from http://bit.ly/15IRIPo

Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning
and mathematical modeling. In L. L. Hatfield, S. Chamberlain & S. Belbase
(Eds.), *New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in
mathematics education*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 1, pp. 33-57). Laramie, WY:
University of Wyoming.

Thompson, P. W. (2012). Advances in research on
quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S.
Belbase (Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding*,
WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 143-148). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017).
Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking
mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), *Compendium for research in mathematics
education* (pp. 421-456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Thompson, P. W., Carlson, M. P., Byerley, C.,
& Hatfield, N. (2014). Schemes for thinking with magnitudes: A hypothesis
about foundational reasoning abilities in algebra. In L. P. Steffe, L. L. Hatfield
& K. C. Moore (Eds.), *Epistemic algebra students: Emerging models of
students' algebraic knowing*, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 4, pp. 1-24). Laramie,
WY: University of Wyoming.

Thompson, P. W., & Draney, K. (2014). A
methodology for investigating teachers' mathematical meanings for teaching. In
P. Liljedahl & C. C. Nicol (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of
the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education *(Vol
6, pp. 246). Vancouver, BC: PME.

Thompson, P. W., Hatfield, N. J., Yoon, H.,
Joshua, S., & Byerley, C. (2017). Covariational reasoning among U.S. and
South Korean secondary mathematics teachers. *Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 48*, 95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.001

Thompson, P. W., & Liu, Y. (2005).
Understandings of margin of error. In S. Wilson (Ed.), *Proceedings of the
Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Internation Group for the Psychology of
Mathematics Education - North America*. Roanoke, VA: PME-NA.

Thompson, P. W., Liu, Y., & Saldanha, L. A.
(2007). Intricacies of statistical inference and teachers' understandings of
them. In M. Lovett & P. Shaw (Eds.), *Thinking with data* (pp.
207-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003).
Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin & D.
Schifter (Eds.), *Research companion to the Principles and Standards for
School Mathematics* (pp. 95-114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers
of Mathematics.

Thompson, P. W., & Silverman, J. (2008). The
concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen
(Eds.), *Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate
mathematics*, MAA Notes (Vol 73, pp. 43-52). Washington, DC: Mathematical
Association of America.

Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1992). *Images
of rate*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/17oJe30

Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1994).
Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher's struggle. *Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 279–303.

Tierney, C., & Monk, S. (2007). Children's
reasoning about change over time. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L.
Blanton (Eds.), *Algebra in the early grades* (pp. 185-200). New York:
Erlbaum.

Tillema, E. S. (2012). Relating one- and
two-dimensional quantities: Students' multiplicative reasoning in combinatorial
and spatial contexts. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase
(Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding*, WISDOMe
Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 113-126). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Trelinski, G. (1983). Spontaneous mathematization
of situations outside mathematics. *Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14*,
275–284.

Trowbridge, D. E. (1980). Investigation of
student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. *American
Journal of Physics, 48*, 1020. doi: 10.1119/1.12298

Trowbridge, D. E. (1981). Investigation of
student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. *American
Journal of Physics, 49*, 242. doi: 10.1119/1.12525

Troy, D. B. (1993). *Future teachers’ imagery
while reasoning quantitatively.* Masters Thesis, San Diego State
University, Department of Mathematical Sciences.

Ulrich, C. (2012). The addition and subtraction
of signed numbers. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase
(Eds.), *Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding*, WISDOMe
Monographs (Vol 2). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.

Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). *Applying
arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part I: Numbers)*.
Chicago: University of Chicago.

Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). *Applying
arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part II: Operations)*.
Chicago: University of Chicago.

Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). *Applying
arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part III: Manuevers)*.
Chicago: University of Chicago.

van der Leeuw , S. E. (2004). Why model? *Cybernetics
and Systems, 35*, 117-128.

Vasco, C. (1985, October).* Comments on the
Whitney-Schwartz definition of quantity*. Ministry of Education, Bogata,
Columbia.

Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual
field: What and why? In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The development of
multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp. 41–59).
Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Verschaffel, L. (1994). Using retelling data to
study elementary school children’s representations and solutions of compare
problems. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 141-165.

Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). *Applied
spatial statistics for public health data*. New York: Wiley.

Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common
cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. *Trends in cognitive sciences,
7*, 483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002

Weber, E., Ellis, A. B., Kulow, T., & Ozgur,
Z. (2014). Six principles for quantitative reasoning and modeling. *Mathematics
Teacher, 108*, 24-30.

Weber, E., & Thompson, P. W. (2014).
Students' images of two-variable functions and their graphs. *Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 86*, 67-85. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9548-0

Wentworth, G. A. (1881). *Elements of algebra*.
Boston: Ginn & Heath.

Wentworth, G. A. (1893). *Elements of algebra
(Teachers' Edition)*. Boston: Ginn & Heath.

Wentworth, G. A. (1898). *An advanced
arithmetic for high schools, normal schools, and academies*. Boston: Ginn
and Company.

Wentworth, G. A., & Hill, T. (1882). *A
practical arithmetic*. Boston: Ginn Heath.

Whitmire, B. J. (2014). *Undergraduate
students' development of covariational reasoning.* BS Honors Mathematics B.
Sc. Honors Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

Whitney, H. (1968). The mathematics of physical
quantities: Part I: Mathematical models for measurement. *American
Mathematical Monthly, 75*, 115-138.

Whitney, H. (1968). The mathematics of physical
quantities: Part II: Quantitative structure and dimensional analysis. *American
Mathematical Monthly, 75*, 227-256.

Wildi, T. (1991). *Units and conversions: A
handbook for engineers and scientists*. New York: IEEE Press.