Adjiage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2007). An experiment in teaching ratio and proportion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 149-175.
Alpers, B. (2009). Studies on the mathematical expertise of mechanical engineers. In R. A. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines & A. Hurfard (Eds.), Modeling students' mathematical modeling competencies: Proceedings of ICTMA 13. New York: Springer.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (350 B.C.E.). Physics (R. P. Hardie & R. K. Gaye, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Internet Classics Archive. Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.mb.txt.
Aubrecht, G. J. (2012). Changes coming to the International System of Units. The Physics Teacher, 50, 338. doi: 10.1119/1.4745684
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2011). About the International System of Units (SI) Part I. Introduction and Bibliography. The Physics Teacher, 49, 493. doi: 10.1119/1.3651731
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2011). About the International System of Units (SI) Part II. Organization and General Principles. The Physics Teacher, 49, 540. doi: 10.1119/1.3661096
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part III. SI Table. The Physics Teacher, 50, 10. doi: 10.1119/1.3670073
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part IV. Writing, Spelling, and Mathematics. The Physics Teacher, 50, 77. doi: 10.1119/1.3677278
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part V. Units Not to be Used with SI. The Physics Teacher, 50, 159. doi: 10.1119/1.3685113
Aubrecht, G. J., French, A. P., & Iona, M. (2012). About the International System of Units (SI) Part VI. SI in the USA. The Physics Teacher, 50, 204. doi: 10.1119/1.3694066
Bakker, A., Groenveld, D., Wijers, M., Akkerman, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2012). Proportional reasoning in the laboratory: an intervention study in vocational education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1-11. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y/fulltext.html doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y
Barrett, J. E., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Quantitying path length: Fourth-grade children's developing abstractions for linear measurement. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 475-520.
Bass, H. (2015). Is the number line something to be built, or occupied? Paper presented at the conference Mathematics Matters in Education: A workshop in honor of Dr. Roger Howe, Texas A & M University.
Bastable, V., & Schifter, D. (2007). Classroom stories: Examples of elementary students engaged in early algebra. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 165-184). New York: Erlbaum.
Beckman, S. (2004). Solving algebra and other story problems with simple diagrams: A method demonstrated in grade 4-6 texts used in Singapore. Mathematics Educator, 14, 42-46.
Bednarz, N., Radford, L., Janvier, B., & Lepage, A. (1992). Arithmetical and algebraic thinking in problem solving. In W. Geeslin & J. Ferrini-Mundy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America (Vol 1. Durham, NH: PME.
Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis -- Emphasis on the operator construct. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 49–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A. (1994). Units of quantity: A conceptual basis common to additive and multiplicative structures. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 123–176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62, 750-762. doi: 10.1119/1.17449
Bender, P. (1990). Zwei "zügande" zum integral-begriff? [Two "approaches" to the integral-concept?]. mathematica didactica, 13, 102-126.
Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra and the elementary classroom: Transforming thinking, transforming practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2007). Building district capacity for teacher development in algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 361-388). New York: Erlbaum.
Bodanskii, F. G. (1991). The formation of an algebraic method of problem solving in primary school. In V. V. Davydov (Ed.), Psychological abilities of primary school children in learning mathematics, Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education (Vol 6). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Boester, T., & Lehrer, R. (2007). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 211-235). New York: Erlbaum.
Bridgman, P. W. (1922). Dimensional analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bridgman, P. W. (1936). The nature of physical theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bridgman, P. W. (1959). The way things are. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2007). Multiple notational systems and algebraic understandings: The case of the "Best Deal" problem. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 273-302). New York: Erlbaum.
Brown, G. B. (1976). Newton, language and mass. Physics Education, 11, 373-377.
Byerley, C., Hatfield, N., & Thompson, P. W. (2012). Calculus students' understandings of division and rate. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 358-363). Portland, OR: MAA/SIGMAA on RUME. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/Ztgu4h.
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Secondary teachers' relative size schemes. In P. Liljedahl & C. C. Nicol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 2, pp. 217-224). Vancouver, BC: PME. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1qyqmaK.
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Secondary teachers' meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168-193.
Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2010). Eighth grade students' representations of linear equations based on a cups and tiles model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 143-162.
Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Impact of early algebra learning and teachers' beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135-167.
Callahan, J., Hoffman, K., Cox, D., O'Shea, D., Pollatsek, H., & Senechal, L. (2008). Calculus in context: The Five College Calculus Project. Amherst, MA: Five Colleges, Inc. Retrieved from Smith College at http://www.math.smith.edu/Local/cicintro/book.pdf.
Callender, C. (2010, June). Is time an illusion? Scientific American, 59-65.
Carlson, M. P., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. A. (2003). Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research and practice. In R. A. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism in mathematics teaching and learning: A models and modeling perspective (pp. 465-478). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., & Brizuela, B. M. (2000). Early algebra, early arithmetic: Treating operations as functions. In M. Fernandez (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America (Vol 1, pp. 1-26). Tucson, AZ: PME-NA.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., & Schwartz, J. L. (2007). Early algebra is not the same as algebra early. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235-272). New York: Erlbaum.
Castillo-Garsow, C. (2013). The role of multiple modeling perspectives in students' learning of exponential growth. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 10, 1437-1453. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1437
Castillo-Garsow, C. C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 55-73). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Chapman, R. H. (1975). The development of children's understanding of proportions. Child Development, 46, 141-148. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep12189755
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovish, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Catagorization and represenation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
Clagett, M. (1968). Nicole Oresme and the medieval geometry of qualities and motions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Cooke, R., & Hilgevoord, J. (1980). The algebra of physical magnitudes. Foundations of Physics, 10, 363-373.
Cortina, J., Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (1999). Multiplicative conceptions of arithmetic mean. In F. Hitt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Cuernavaca, Mexico: Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados.
Darrigol, O. (2003). Number and measure: Hermann von Helmholtz at the crossroads of mathematics, physics, and psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34, 515-573. doi: 10.1016/s0039-3681(03)00043-8
Davydov, V. V. (1975). The psychological characteristics of the “prenumerical” period of mathematics instruction (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol 7, pp. 109–206). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V. V. (1975). Logical and psychological problems of elementary mathematics as an academic discipline (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol 7, pp. 55-108). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Dogbey, J. (2015). Using variables in school mathematics: Do school mathematics curricula provide support for teachers? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1175-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10763-015-9643-4
Dougherty, B. (2007). Measure up: A quantitative view of early algebra. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 389-412). New York: Erlbaum.
Doughty, L., McLoughlin, E., & van Kampen, P. (2014). What integration cues, and what cues integration in intermediate electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 82, 1093-1103. doi: 10.1119/1.4892613
Dubinsky, E. (1994). Comments on James Kaput's chapter: New routes to old routes. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 157-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
El'konin, D. B., & Davydov, V. V. (1975). Learning capacity and age level: Introduction (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol 7, pp. 1-12). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Elandt-Johnson, R. C. (1975). Definiton of rates: Some remarks on their use and misuse. American Journal of Epidemiology, 102, 267-271.
Ellis, A. B. (2007). The influence of reasoning with emergent quantitites on students' generalizations. Cognition & Instruction, 25, 439-478.
Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students mathematical generalizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 308-345.
Ellis, A. B., Özgür, Z., Kulow, T., Williams, C. C., & Amidon, J. (2012). Quantifying exponential growth: The case of the Jactus. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 93-112). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Ely, R. (2017). Definite integral registers using infinitesimals. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 152-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.002
Empson, S. B., Junk, D., Dominguez, H., & Turner, E. (2006). Fractions as the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children's thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 1-28.
Engrand, J. C. (1981). Units and their equivalences. Paris: Vuibert.
Ferrari-Escolá, M., Martínez-Sierra, G., & Méndez-Guevara, M. E. M. (2016). “Multiply by adding”: Development of logarithmic-exponential covariational reasoning in high school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 92-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.03.003
Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Solares, A. (2010). Problems dealing with unknown quantities and two different levels of representing unknowns. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 52-80.
Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3–17.
Fonger, N. L., Ellis, A., & Dogan, M. F. (2016). Students’conceptions supporting their symbolization and meaning of function rules. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the INternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 156-163). Tucson, AZ: PME-NA.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Battey, D. (2007). Content matters: Algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 333-360). New York: Erlbaum.
Freudenthal, H. (1974). Soviet research on teaching algebra at the lower grades of the elementary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5, 391-412.
Freudenthal, H. (1982). Variables and functions. In G. v. Barneveld & H. Krabbendam (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Functions, pp. 7-20). Enschede, The Netherlands: National Institute for Curriculum Development.
Freudenthal, H. (1993). Thoughts on teaching mechanics: Didactical phenomenology of the concept of force. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 71-87. doi: 10.2307/3482878
Fritzsch, H. (1994). An equation that changed the world: Newton, Einstein and the theory of relativity (K. Heusch, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Galilei, G. (1914). Dialogue conerning two new sciences (H. Crew & A. d. Salvio, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/tns_draft/.
Glasser, H. M. (2012). The numbers speak: Physics first supports math performance. The Physics Teacher, 50, 53. doi: 10.1119/1.3670088
Goldberg, H., & Wagreich, P. (1990). Teaching integrated math and science: A curriculum and staff development project for the elementary school. In N. Fisher, H. Keynes & P. Wagreich (Eds.), Mathematicians and education reform: Proceedings of the July 6-8, 1988 workshop (pp. 63–130). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Goldenberg, E. P., & Shteingold, N. (2007). Early algebra: The math workshop perspective. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 449-478). New York: Erlbaum.
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111-129. doi: 10.1023/a:1003749919816
Greer, B. (1988). Non-conservation of multiplication and division: Analysis of a symptom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 281–298.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of resarch on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 276–295). New York: Macmillan.
Greer, B. (1993). The mathematical modeling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 223–250.
Greer, B. (1994). Extending the meaning of multiplication and division. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 61–87). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Hack, W. N., & Baird, W. H. (2012). Using a high-speed camera to measure the speed of sound. The Physics Teacher, 50, 45. doi: 10.1119/1.3670086
Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 383-432. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2010.511565
Hackenberg, A. J., Jones, R., Eker, A., & Creager, M. (2017). “Approximate” multiplicative relationships between quantitative unknowns. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 38-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.002
Hall, R., Kibler, D., Wenger, E., & Truxaw, C. (1989). Exploring the episodic structure of algebra story problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 223–283.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043-1056.
Hammer, D. (in press). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education.
Hanna, G., Bruyn, Y. d., Sidoli, N., & Lomas, D. (2004). Teaching proof in the context of physics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 36, 82-90.
Harel, G., Behr, M., Lesh, R. A., & Post, T. (1994). Invariance of ratio: The case of children's anticipatory scheme for constancy of taste. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 324–345.
Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A. (1992). The blocks task and qualitative reasoning skills of 7th Grade children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 45–96.
Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. A. (1994). The impact of number type on the solution of multiplication and division problems: Further considerations. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 365–386). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Hart, K. (1978). The understanding of ratios in secondary school. Mathematics in School, 7, 4–6.
Hawkings, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time. New York: Bantam.
Hedrick, E. R. (1921). The function concept in secondary school mathematics: A report to the National Committee on Mathematical Requirements. (Secondary School Circular, No. 8). Washington, DC: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1kqIEtS.
Hegarty, M., Just, M., & Morrison, I. (1988). Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 191–236.
Heller, P. M., Post, T. R., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. A. (1990). Qualitative and numerical reasoning about fractions and rates by seventh- and eighth-grade students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 388–402.
Helmholtz, H. V. (1878/1977). The facts in perception. In Epistemological Writings (pp. 115-185): Springer.
Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 33, 502-506.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
Hiebert, J. (1981). Cognitive development and learning linear measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 197-211.
Hirstein, J. J., Lamb, C. E., & Osborne, A. (1978). Student misconcpetions about area. Arithmetic Teacher, 25, 10–16.
Hohensee, C. (2014). Backward transfer: An investigation of the influence of quadratic functions instruction on students’ prior ways of reasoning about linear functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16, 135-174. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2014.889503
Hunt, J. (2007). Communicating big themes in applied mathematics. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications (pp. 2-24). Chichester, UK: Horwood Publishing.
Huntley, H. E. (1967). Dimensional analysis. New York: Dover.
Ipsen, D. C. (1923). Units, dimensions, and dimensionless numbers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Izsak, A. (2004). Students' coordination of knowledge when learning to model physical situations. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 81-128. doi: 10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_4
Izsák, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition & Instruction, 26, 95-143. doi: 10.1080/07370000701798529
Izsák, A., Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2009). Meta-representation in an Algebra I classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 549-587.
Izsák, A., & Findell, B. R. (2005). Adaptive interpretation: Building continuity between students' experiences solving problems in arithmetic and in algebra. ZDM Mathematics Education, 37, 60-67.
Janvier, C. (1981). Use of situations in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 113–122.
Jiang, C., & Chua, B. L. (2010). Strategies for solving three fraction-related word problems on speed: A comparative study between Chinese and Singaporean students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 73-96.
Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 313-330.
Johnson, H. L. (2012). Reasoning about quantities involved in rate of change as varying simultaneously and independently. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 39-53). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Johnson, H. L. (2015). Together yet separate: Students’ associating amounts of change in quantities involved in rate of change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 89-110. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9590-y
Johnson, H. L. (in press). Secondary students’ quantification of ratio and rate: A framework for reasoning about change in covarying quantities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning.
Johnston, P. R. (2013). How long is my toilet roll? – a simple exercise in mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44, 938-950. doi: 10.1080/0020739x.2013.790502
Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.002
Joram, E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Gelman, R. (1998). Measurement estimation: Learning to map the route from number to quantity and back. Review of Educational Research, 68, 413-449.
Joshua, S., Musgrave, S., Hatfield, N., & Thompson, P. W. (2015). Conceptualizing and reasoning with frames of reference. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, K. Keene & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 31-44). Pittsburgh, PA: RUME.
Kamii, C., & Russell, K. A. (2010). The older of two trees: Young children's development of operational time. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 6-13.
Kamii, C., & Russell, K. A. (2012). Elapsed time: Why is it so difficult to teach? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 296-315.
Kaput, J. J. (1985). The cognitive foundations of models that use intensive quantities. Southeastern Massachussetts University, Department of Mathematics.
Kaput, J. J. (1986). Quantity structure of algebra word problems: A preliminary analysis. Southeastern Massachussetts University, Department of Mathematics.
Kaput, J. J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: New routes to old roots. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 77–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J. (2007). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-18). New York: Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J., Blanton, M. L., & Moreno, L. (2007). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 19-56). New York: Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M. L. (Eds.). (2007). Algebra in the early grades. New York: Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J., & Pattison-Gordon, L. (1987). A concrete-to-abstract software ramp: Environments for learning multiplication, division, and intensive quantity. Southeastern Massachussetts University, Department of Mathematics.
Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 237–287). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Karplus, R. (1979). Continuous functions: Students’ viewpoints. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 397-415. doi: 10.1080/0140528790010404
Keene, K. A. (2007). A characterization of dynamic reasoning: Reasoning with time as parameter. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 230-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.09.003
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.
Klein, A. H. (1974). The world of measurements: The definitive book on the units and concepts by which we measure everything in our universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. College Mathematics Journal, 20, 282–300.
Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 129-164.
Lamon, S. J. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 89–120). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Lawson, A., & Bealer, J. (1984). The acquisition of basic quantitative reasoning skills during adolescence: Learning or development? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 417–423.
Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2013). Relationships between fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning: The case of willa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 975-1000. doi: DOI 10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8
Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of entropy and thermodynamics — Part II. The Physics Teacher, 50, 87. doi: 10.1119/1.3677281
Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of entropy and thermodynamics — Part III. The Physics Teacher, 50, 170. doi: 10.1119/1.3685118
Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of entropy and thermodynamics — Part IV. The Physics Teacher, 50, 215. doi: 10.1119/1.3694071
Left, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of entropy and thermodynamics — Part I. The Physics Teacher, 50, 28. doi: 10.1119/1.3670080
Lehrer, R. (2013). A learning progression emerges in a trading zone of professional community and identity. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science education: Papers from an international STEM research symposium, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 3, pp. 173-186). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Leinwand, S., & Ginsburg, A. (2009). Measuring up: How the highest performing state (Massachussetts) compares to the highest performing country (Hong Kong) in grade 3 mathematics. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Lesh, R. A., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models and applied mathematical problem-solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 263–343). New York: Academic Press.
Lesh, R. A., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lins, R., & Kaput, J. (2004). The early development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. In The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12 th ICMI Study (pp. 45-70): Springer.
Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2002). Randomness: Rethinking the foundations of probability. In D. Mewborn (Ed.), Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Athens, GA: PME-NA.
Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2004). Teachers' personal and pedagogical understandings of probability and statistical inference. In D. McDougall (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Toronto: PME-NA.
Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2005). Teachers' understandings of hypothesis testing. In S. Wilson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North America. Roanoke, VA: PME-NA.
Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Teachers' understandings of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 113-160.
Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. W. (2009). Mathematics teachers' understandings of proto-hypothesis testing. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 126-138. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/16JZQTx.
Livy, S., & Herbert, S. (2013). Second-year pre-service teachers' responses to proportional reasoning test items. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 17-32. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol38/iss11/2.
Lo, J.-J., & Watanabe, T. (1997). Developing ratio and proportion schemes: A story of a fifth grader. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 216-236.
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Students' mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44, 809-850.
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012). Using student reasoning to inform the development of conceptual learning goals: The case of quadratic functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 85-119.
Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87-116.
Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2002). Developing understanding of ratio-as-measure as a foundation for slope. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: 2002 Yearbook of the NCTM. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lochhead, J., & Mestre, J. (1988). From words to algebra: Mending misconceptions. In A. Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra: K-12 (pp. 127–135). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Lopshits, A. M. (1963). Computation of areas of oriented figures (J. Massalski & C. Mills, Trans.), Survey of recent East European mathematical literature, A. I. Putnam & I. Wirszup, ed. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Madison, B. L., Carlson, M. P., Oehrtman, M., & Tallman, M. (2015). Conceptual precalculus: Strengthening students' quantitative and covariational reasoning. The Mathematics Teacher, 109, 54-59.
Mark-Zigdon, N., & Tirosh, D. (2007). What is a legitamate arithmetic number sentence? The case of kindergarten and first-grade children. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 201-210). New York: Erlbaum.
Mashood, K. K. (2010). Historico-Critical Analysis of the Concept of Mass: From Antiquity to Newton. Episteme, 3, 33-37.
Mason, J. (2007). Making use of children's powers to produce algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57-94). New York: Erlbaum.
Mason, J., Graham, A., Pimm, D., & Gowar, N. (1985). Routes to roots of algebra. Milton Keynes, U.K.: Open University Press.
Massironi, C. (2014). Philip Fisher’s sense of numbers. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 6, 302-331. doi: 10.1108/qrfm-01-2013-0004
Massironi, C., & Chesini, G. (2016). Kenneth Fisher's heuristics: An account of Kenneth Fisher's framework to reason the innovation of investing tools and invest by knowing what others don't. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8, 130-148. doi: 10.l108/QRFM-07-2015-0026
Matthews, P. G., & Ellis, A. B. (in press). Natural alternatives to natural number: The case of ratio. Journal of Numerical Cognition.
Mayes, R. L., Forrester, J. H., Christus, J. S., Peterson, F. I., Bonilla, R., & Yestness, N. (2013). Quantitative reasoning in environmental science: A learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 1-24.
McDermott, L., Rosenquist, M., & vanZee, E. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 503–513.
Mellone, M., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). The effect of rewording and dyadic interaction on realistic reasoning in solving word problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.02.002
Michell, J. (1993). The origins of the representational theory of measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24, 185-206.
Miller, A. I. (1984). Imagery in scientific thought. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
Minskaya, G. I. (1975). Developing the concept of number by means of the relationship of quantities (A. Bigelow, Trans.). In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics (Vol 7, pp. 207–261). Palo Alto, CA and Reston, VA: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the ’’at rest’’ condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10. doi: 10.1119/1.2340924
Monk, G. S. (1992). A study of calculus students’ constructions of functional situations: The case of the shadow problem. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Conference Paper
Monk, G. S. (1992). Students’ understanding of a function given by a physical model. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 175–194). Washington, D. C.: Mathematical Association of America.
Monk, S., & Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 1, Issues in Mathematics Education (Vol 4, pp. 139–168). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Moore, K. C. (2010). The role of quantitative reasoning in precalculus students learning central concepts of trigonometry. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, quantitative reasoning, and the trigonometry of students. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 75-92). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Moore, K. C. (2012). Making sense by measuring arcs: A teaching experiment in angle measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 225-245. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9450-6
Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function: The case of Zac. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45, 102-138.
Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.001
Moore, K. C., Carlson, M. P., & Oehrtman, M. (2009). The role of quantitative reasoning in solving applied precalculus problems. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (SIGMAA on RUME) Conference, Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Moore, K. C., & Thompson, P. W. (under review). Static and emergent shape thinking.
Moyer, J. C., Sowder, L., Threadgill-Sowder, J., & Moyer, M. B. (1984). Story problem formats: Drawn versus verbal versus telegraphic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 342-351.
Mullen, K. (2007). Students' conceptions of time as a variable. BS Honors Mathematics B. Sc. Honors Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Musgrave, S., Hatfield, N., & Thompson, P. W. (2015). Calculus students' meaning for difference. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, K. Keene & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 809-814). Pittsburgh, PA: RUME.
Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 329-389.
Nemirovsky, R. (1994). On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and the velocity sign. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 389-422.
Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of difficulties in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, ??–??
Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6, ??–??
Newton, I., Sir. (1952). Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (A. Motte & F. Cajori, Trans.), The Great Books. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: An unknown quantity? In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York: Macmillan.
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part I - differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 217–253.
Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept. Part 2 - Problem structure at successive stages: Problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptive restructuring. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 331–363.
Nunes, T. (2012). Number, quantities and relations: Understanding mathematical reasoning in primary school. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea: PME.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2015). The development of quantitative reasoning. In L. S. Liben & U. Müller (Eds.), Handbook of child development and developmental science (Vol 2 - Cognitive processes, pp. 715-762). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., & Barros, R. (2015). Assessing quantitative reasoning in young children. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 178-196. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2015.1016815
Nunes, T., Desli, D., & Bell, D. (2003). The development of children's understanding of intensive quantities. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 651-675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.10.002
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Núñez, R. (2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160-181). New York: Springer.
Olive, J., & Çağlayan, G. (2008). Learners’ difficulties with quantitative units in algebraic word problems and the teacher’s interpretation of those difficulties. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 269-292.
Paoletti, T., & Moore, K. C. (2017). The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 137-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003
Park, J. (2015). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do we teach it? Educational Studies in Mathematics. doi: 10.1007/s10649-015-9601-7
Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Research in Education, 65, 421-481.
Paulos, J. A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.
Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books.
Peled, I., & Carraher, D. W. (2007). Signed numbers and algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 303-328). New York: Erlbaum.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child's construction of quantities: Conservation and atomism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pimthong, P., Yutakom, N., Angka, V. R., Sanguanruang, S., Cowie, B., & Cooper, B. (2012). Teaching and learning about matter in grade 6 classrooms: A conceptual change approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 121-137.
Pollak, H. O. (1969). How can we teach applications of mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2, 393-404. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482089.
Powers, W. (1973). Feedback: Beyond behaviorism. Science, 179, 351–356.
Reed, S. K. (2006). Does unit analysis help students construct equations? Cognition and Instruction, 24, 341-366.
Resnick, L. B., & Singer, J. A. (1993). Protoquantitative origins of ratio reasoning. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 107–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 49–101.
Roberts, D. A., & Östman, L. (1998). Problems of meaning in science curriculum, Ways of knowing in science series. New York: Teachers College Press.
Robinson, E. (1977). On the uniqueness of problems in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 25, 23–26.
Saenz-Ludlow, A. (1994). Michael's fraction schemes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 50–85.
Saenz-Ludlow, A. (1995). Ann’s fraction schemes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 101–132.
Saldanha, L. A. (2016). Conceptual issues in quantifying unusualness and conceiving stochastic experiments: Insights from students’ experiences in designing sampling simulations. Statistics Education Research Journal, 15, 81-105.
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (1998). Re-thinking co-variation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berenson & W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North America (Vol 1, pp. 298-304). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1b4sjQE.
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2002). Students' scheme-based conceptions of sampling and its relationship to statistical inference. In D. Mewborn (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North America (Vol 3, pp. 1305-1312). Athens, GA: PME-NA.
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2003). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 257-270.
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Exploring connections between sampling distributions and statistical inference: An analysis of students' engagement and thinking in the context of instruction involving repeated sampling. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 270-297.
Sawyer, W. W. (1964). Vision in elementary mathematics (Vol. 1), Introducing mathematics. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
Schifter, D., Monk, S., Russell, S. J., & Bastable, V. (2007). Early algebra: What does understanding the laws of arithmetic mean in the elementary grades. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 413-448). New York: Erlbaum.
Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Brizuela, B. M. (2006). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic. New York: Routledge.
Schmidt, S., & Weiser, W. (1995). Semantic structures of one-step word problems involving multiplication or division. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 55–72.
Schmittau, J. (1993). Historical and concerptual analysis as foundations for curriculum: Multiplicative structrure as a case. Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Misconceptions Trust. Retrieved from http://mlrg.org/proc3pdfs/Schmittau_Mathematics.pdf.
Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of algebraic thinking: A Vygotskian perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 37, 16-22.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Early algebra as mathematical sense making. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 479-510). New York: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, J. (1988). Intensive quantity and referent transforming arithmetic operations. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 41–52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Selter, C., Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 211-213.
Sengupta, P., Krinks, K. D., & Clark, D. B. (2015). Learning to deflect: Conceptual change in physics during digital game play. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 638-674. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2015.1082912
Siegler, R. S., Strauss, S., & Levin, I. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46, 1-84. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1165995.
Simon, M. A. (1996). Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: The search for a sense of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 197-210.
Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Building and understanding multiplicative relationships: A study of preservice teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 472–494.
Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1994). Mathematical modeling as a component of understanding ratio-as-measure: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 183-197. doi: 10.1016/0732-3123(94)90022-1
Simon, M. A., & Placa, N. (2012). Reasoning about intensive quantities in whole-number multiplication? A possible basis for ratio understanding. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32, 35-41.
Smith, E. (2007). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133-160). New York: Erlbaum.
Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (1998). Multiplicative quantitative reasoning and algebra. Employing children's natural powers to build algebraic reasoning in the context of elementary mathematics.
Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York: Erlbaum.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115–163.
Smith, J. P., Males, L. M., Dietiker, L. C., Lee, K., & Mosier, A. (2013). Curricular treatments of length measurement in the United States: Do they address known learning challenges? Cognition and Instruction, 31, 388-433. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2013.828728
Sowder, J. T., Armstrong, B. E., Lamon, S. J., Simon, M. A., Sowder, L. K., & Thompson, A. G. (1998). Educating teachers to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 127-155.
Stalvey, H. E., & Vidakovic, D. (2015). Students’ reasoning about relationships between variables in a real-world problem. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 192-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.002
Steen, L. A. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1-22). Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
Steffe, L. P. (1991). Operations that generate quantity. Journal of Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 61–82.
Steffe, L. P. (1991). Composite units and their schemes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Conference Paper
Steffe, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying and dividing schemes: An overview. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3–39). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Steffe, L. P. (2003). Fractional commensurate, composition, and adding schemes: Learning trjectories of Jason and Laura. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 237-295.
Steffe, L. P. (2013). On children's construction of quantification. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning in mathematics and science education: Papers from an international STEM research symposium, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 3, pp. 13-41). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Steiner, H.-G. (1969). Magnitudes and rational numbers: A didactical analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2, 371-392. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3482088. doi: 10.2307/3482088
Streefland, L. (1993). Fractions: A realistic approach. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 289–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students' preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 89-112.
Sylla, E. (1971). Medieval quantifications of qualities: The "merton school". Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 8, 9-39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41133336. doi: 10.2307/41133336
Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In A. Coxford (Ed.), 1994 Yearbook of the NCTM (pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1993). A cognitive perspective on the mathematical preparation of teachers. Paper presented at the Algebra Initiative Colloquium, Washingon, DC.
Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2-24.
Thompson, P. W. (1987, 1991). Word Problem Analyst (Version 2.1) [Cognitive modeling program]. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
Thompson, P. W. (1988). Preparing middle-school students for algebra. Paper presented at the NCTM Research Presession, Chicago, IL. Conference Paper
Thompson, P. W. (1988). Quantitative concepts as a foundation for algebra. In M. Behr (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 1, pp. 163–170). Dekalb, IL. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/11hLII7.
Thompson, P. W. (1990). A theoretical model of quantity-based reasoning in arithmetic and algebra. San Diego State University, Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Education.
Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 165–208.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 229–274.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Bridges between mathematics and science education. Paper presented at the Research blueprint for science education conference, New Orleans, LA. Conference Paper
Thompson, P. W. (1995). Notation, convention, and quantity in elementary mathematics. In J. Sowder & B. Schapelle (Eds.), Providing a foundation for teaching middle school mathematics (pp. 199–221). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Thompson, P. W. (1996). Imagery and the development of mathematical reasoning. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 267-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thompson, P. W. (2000). What is required to understand fractal dimension? The Mathematics Educator, 10, 33-35.
Thompson, P. W. (2008). One approach to a coherent K-12 mathematics: Or, it takes 12 years to learn calculus. Paper presented at the Pathways to Algebra Conference, Mayenne, France. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/15IRIPo
Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In L. L. Hatfield, S. Chamberlain & S. Belbase (Eds.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 1, pp. 33-57). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Thompson, P. W. (2012). Advances in research on quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 143-148). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Thompson, P. W., Carlson, M. P., Byerley, C., & Hatfield, N. (2014). Schemes for thinking with magnitudes: A hypothesis about foundational reasoning abilities in algebra. In L. P. Steffe, L. L. Hatfield & K. C. Moore (Eds.), Epistemic algebra students: Emerging models of students' algebraic knowing, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 4, pp. 1-24). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Thompson, P. W., & Draney, K. (2014). A methodology for investigating teachers' mathematical meanings for teaching. In P. Liljedahl & C. C. Nicol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 6, pp. 246). Vancouver, BC: PME.
Thompson, P. W., Hatfield, N. J., Yoon, H., Joshua, S., & Byerley, C. (2017). Covariational reasoning among U.S. and South Korean secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.001
Thompson, P. W., & Liu, Y. (2005). Understandings of margin of error. In S. Wilson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Internation Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North America. Roanoke, VA: PME-NA.
Thompson, P. W., Liu, Y., & Saldanha, L. A. (2007). Intricacies of statistical inference and teachers' understandings of them. In M. Lovett & P. Shaw (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 207-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), Research companion to the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 95-114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Thompson, P. W., & Silverman, J. (2008). The concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics, MAA Notes (Vol 73, pp. 43-52). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1992). Images of rate. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/17oJe30
Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, Part I: A teacher's struggle. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 279–303.
Tierney, C., & Monk, S. (2007). Children's reasoning about change over time. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 185-200). New York: Erlbaum.
Tillema, E. S. (2012). Relating one- and two-dimensional quantities: Students' multiplicative reasoning in combinatorial and spatial contexts. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2, pp. 113-126). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Trelinski, G. (1983). Spontaneous mathematization of situations outside mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 275–284.
Trowbridge, D. E. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1020. doi: 10.1119/1.12298
Trowbridge, D. E. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49, 242. doi: 10.1119/1.12525
Troy, D. B. (1993). Future teachers’ imagery while reasoning quantitatively. Masters Thesis, San Diego State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences.
Ulrich, C. (2012). The addition and subtraction of signed numbers. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol 2). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). Applying arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part I: Numbers). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). Applying arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part II: Operations). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Usiskin, Z., & Bell, M. (1983). Applying arithmetic - A handbook of applications of arithmetic (Part III: Manuevers). Chicago: University of Chicago.
van der Leeuw , S. E. (2004). Why model? Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 117-128.
Vasco, C. (1985, October). Comments on the Whitney-Schwartz definition of quantity. Ministry of Education, Bogata, Columbia.
Vergnaud, G. (1994). Multiplicative conceptual field: What and why? In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 41–59). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Verschaffel, L. (1994). Using retelling data to study elementary school children’s representations and solutions of compare problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 141-165.
Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. New York: Wiley.
Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7, 483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
Weber, E., Ellis, A. B., Kulow, T., & Ozgur, Z. (2014). Six principles for quantitative reasoning and modeling. Mathematics Teacher, 108, 24-30.
Weber, E., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Students' images of two-variable functions and their graphs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 67-85. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9548-0
Wentworth, G. A. (1881). Elements of algebra. Boston: Ginn & Heath.
Wentworth, G. A. (1893). Elements of algebra (Teachers' Edition). Boston: Ginn & Heath.
Wentworth, G. A. (1898). An advanced arithmetic for high schools, normal schools, and academies. Boston: Ginn and Company.
Wentworth, G. A., & Hill, T. (1882). A practical arithmetic. Boston: Ginn Heath.
Whitmire, B. J. (2014). Undergraduate students' development of covariational reasoning. BS Honors Mathematics B. Sc. Honors Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Whitney, H. (1968). The mathematics of physical quantities: Part I: Mathematical models for measurement. American Mathematical Monthly, 75, 115-138.
Whitney, H. (1968). The mathematics of physical quantities: Part II: Quantitative structure and dimensional analysis. American Mathematical Monthly, 75, 227-256.
Wildi, T. (1991). Units and conversions: A handbook for engineers and scientists. New York: IEEE Press.